Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a general score of 93.6 against 72.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. Galaxy S10 5G is a much newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy S III AT&T, although it's way heavier.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a really bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a much better pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a quite better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 6 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography, a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs, a lot better video resolution and a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 114% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.