Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Polycarbonate | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is way better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. Galaxy S10 Lite is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's also notably heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720px, a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a way smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a way better (4K) video quality, a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures and a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.