Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a 93.4 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, although it is somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a more powerful processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 has a more vivid display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a larger screen and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S22 takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way larger aperture, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.