Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 4.73 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy S III AT&T. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, providing some extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 6 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a bigger display and a greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger camera aperture, a much better 50 MP resolution camera, a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy S25 is more expensive than Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.