Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 4.73 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, having a 90.7 score against 72.2. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably lighter and extremely thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a way bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S III AT&T features a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has lesser CPU cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a much bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher video definition and a much higher 200 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.