Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a global score of 81 against 72.2. Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a lot smaller display, a lot lesser pixels per display inch and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has a way smaller sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much more MP back camera and a much bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.