Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 85.6 score against 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 3 is incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a lot thinner and notably newer.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has more pixels per display inch, a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a much larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower resolution and a much tinier diafragm aperture. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 57% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.