Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a global score of 94.6 against 72.2. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing a couple additional features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is much newer and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is notably heavier.
Galaxy S III AT&T has a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, although it has a little lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, a way worse 1280 x 720px resolution and a really smaller display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot larger aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 114% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.