Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but way heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a better processing power than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a way smaller display, a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little worse screen density.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.