Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black Shadow |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a 91.1 score against 72.2. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is a lot thinner but much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels, a bit better pixel density and a much bigger display. Galaxy S III AT&T has a much faster CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has 6 lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution and a lot bigger aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.