Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blasting black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a general score of 90.1 against 72.2. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's body is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is notably heavier and thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a more recent 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and 6 more CPU cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a much bigger display and a much higher pixel count per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a way larger camera aperture, a way better video definition and a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.