Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-04-04 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy S III AT&T, having a 78.7 score against 72.2. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has the newer 12 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it provides you some additional features and a performance increase. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is a newer phone than Galaxy S III AT&T, although it's heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a much greater performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory and 6 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, a way smaller display and a way lower 1280 x 720px resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality images and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.