Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-25 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora Blue, Cosmic Gray and Dream White |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a score of 83.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite is notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a superior hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a really larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a greater number of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite has a much better battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 98 percent more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a lot higher video resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture and a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.