Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a a lot newer phone than the Galaxy S III AT&T, although it is way heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and more RAM. Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, although it has a bit lower pixel number per display inch, a really smaller display and a way worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a way better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations, a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.