Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has an overall score of 83.8, which is better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's just a little thinner and incredibly newer. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Galaxy S III AT&T features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, a really smaller display and a way lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way better 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 62% more battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s costs a bit more money than Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.