Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and Ceramic |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T, with a global score of 79.8 against 72.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it gives some additional features and performance improvements. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold is incredibly heavier than Galaxy S III AT&T, it's somewhat thinner and much newer.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a better pixel quantity per display inch, a lot larger display and a much higher resolution of 1860 x 2480 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has 10 GB less RAM and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a way more mega-pixels camera. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.