Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a overall score of 84.3 against 72.2. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has newer 14 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a notably newer and way thinner device than the Galaxy S III AT&T, although it's much heavier.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way better looking display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 2224 x 2488px. The Galaxy S III AT&T features a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger camera aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.