Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 87.9 score against 72.2. These devices use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a more recent 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it is much heavier and a little thicker.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger display, a greater screen density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more processing cores. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much bigger aperture and a way larger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 124% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.