Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 13 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a global score of 79.5, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro body has the same thickness than the Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's noticeably heavier. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a newer 13 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a lot greater amount of pixels per display inch. Galaxy S III AT&T has a much greater performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.