Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a general score of 78.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's construction is newer, but just a little bit thicker and much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it counts with some extra features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a quite lower pixel count in each screen inch and a much smaller screen. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more cores and 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger aperture, a much better video quality and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.