Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is better than Galaxy S III AT&T's score of 72.2. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is newer than Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is incredibly heavier and a bit thicker. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, giving some additional features.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a greater pixels density and a much bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a greater camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a way larger camera aperture for better low light images and video.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.