Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-03-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, giving you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro body is noticeably newer, but noticeably heavier and a little thicker than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a superior performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although it has a bit lower pixels number in each inch of screen, a much lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger aperture. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 146 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.