Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Polycarbonate | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T, having a general score of 82.4 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro design is way newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is also incredibly heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM and more processing cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher display density and a lot bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.