Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a global score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is a lot heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400, more pixels per screen inch and a really bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.