Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an overall score of 82.2, which is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's design is just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a quite better performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a lot bigger display and a lot better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has a much tinier sensor, it also counts with a camera with way more MP and a much bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light situations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.