Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, with a score of 86.1 against 72.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has newer 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, counting with some extra features and performance enhancements. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is notably heavier but a bit thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way better screen density, a much higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a way larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot bigger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.