Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is slightly better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a score of 77.1 against 72.2. These phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G body is much heavier but just a little thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a way better screen pixels density and a much bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.