Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a general score of 75.7, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 global score. These phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has the newer 12 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, counting with some additional features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's design is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 6 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen, a way larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video, a camera with a much higher resolution, a much larger sensor and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.