Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2012-06-04 | 2018-02-22 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro is a a lot newer and a bit thinner phone than the Galaxy S III AT&T, although it is also a lot heavier.
The Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has a really smaller screen, a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way higher 12 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.