Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is better than Galaxy S III AT&T, having an 81.1 score against 72.2. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and 6 more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a bit lower pixels density and a way smaller display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a much higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot larger aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 139 percent greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.