Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has newer 10 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it provides a couple additional features and optimized performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T construction is extremely newer, but a bit thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Galaxy S III AT&T features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, although it has a much smaller display, a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little worse pixels quantity in each display inch. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a better performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a much larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.