Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 67.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 0000-00-00 | 2016-11-07 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.72 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 104.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 8937 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 4, with a global score of 71.5 against 67.1. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi 4 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner device than the Xiaomi Redmi 4.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Redmi 4 also counts with 6 more cpu cores (although they are slower). Galaxy S III Cricket has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi 4, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a little better pixel density.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 4 also has a bigger camera aperture and a way better 13 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy S III Cricket has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 16 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi 4 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Xiaomi Redmi 4, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.