Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | iOS 15.x |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is a lot better than Galaxy S III's 74.8 overall score. The iPhone 13 Pro is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S III, although it is also noticeably heavier. IPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S III works with Android 4.3 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory, a 64 bits CPU and a larger number of cores. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S III, because it has a higher display pixels density, a much brighter display, a lot higher resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a larger display.
The iPhone 13 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much better 12 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III, because it has 3095mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S III, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S III. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S III, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.