Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III, with an 87.5 score against 74.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S III's, but it's also notably heavier. Both devices we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it gives lots of additional features.
Galaxy S III counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a much lower pixels density and a lot smaller display. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S III, because it has a 3885mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot better (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a much higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution, a lot larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a larger camera sensor taking better quality photos.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S III, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.