Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K52 has an overall score of 76, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III's general score of 74.8. The LG K52 design is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner, but way heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but LG K52 has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, so it counts with some extra features and a performance increase.
LG K52 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S III has a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
LG K52 features a superior camera than Galaxy S III, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the LG K52 also has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited environments, a way better resolution camera and a way bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG K52 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has a 90 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.