Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III, having a score of 85.4 against 74.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG K92 has a more recent 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The LG K92 design is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also much heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III.
Samsung Galaxy S III features a bit better screen than LG K92, although it has a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution, a lot smaller screen and a just a little inferior number of pixels per screen inch. LG K92 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM. LG K92 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a back camera with lot more MP and a much larger sensor.
The LG K92 has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG K92 costs a lot more money than Galaxy S III, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.