Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy S III, with an 87.6 score against 74.8. These phones use Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is notably newer than Galaxy S III, it's just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a slightly better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a much higher video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has a 138 percent larger battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S III, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.