Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than Samsung Galaxy S III, with a general score of 87.1 against 74.8. The LG Velvet body is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but a lot heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III. LG Velvet has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy S III has a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, although it has a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px, a just a bit less pixels per screen inch and a lot smaller display. LG Velvet features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera, a lot larger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG Velvet counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. The LG Velvet features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S III, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs more money than Galaxy S III, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.