Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III, getting a score of 81.9 against 74.8. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it counts with some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III, it's just a little bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
The Galaxy S III has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less processing cores and 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking screen than Galaxy S III, because it has a much better pixels count per screen inch, a much higher 1256 x 2760 resolution, a way bigger screen and a really brighter display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a much higher (4K) video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.