Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a score of 81.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy S III's general score of 74.8. The Moto G 5G is a a lot newer device than Galaxy S III, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G 5G has a newer 10 version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version.
Samsung Galaxy S III has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, a way smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px. Moto G 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S III, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and 4 more processing cores. Moto G 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography.
The Moto G 5G counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.