Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-05-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S III's global score of 74.8. Motorola One Action's design is notably newer than Galaxy S III's, although it is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S III features a little bit better screen than Motorola One Action, although it has a way worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, a much smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720.
Motorola One Action counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S III, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Action has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola One Action has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a way better (4K) video definition. The Motorola One Action features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Action is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S III, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S III. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S III, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.