Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III's overall score of 74.8. Motorola One Hyper's construction is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S III's, although it is much heavier and just a bit thicker. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S III has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720, a really smaller screen and a little less pixels per display inch.
Motorola One Hyper features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 90 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S III, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S III. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S III, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.