Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III, getting a 79.9 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A25 5G body is incredibly newer and just a bit thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, so it provides the user some additional features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S III, because it has a really bigger screen, more pixels per inch of screen, a way brighter display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S III, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
Galaxy S III counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a larger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with way more MP, a way bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.