Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Galaxy S III, having a 91.3 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A52 5G body is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S III. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III has a little sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a really smaller screen, a just a little lower pixel density and a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S III, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light environments, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.