Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-05-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than Galaxy S III's score of 74.8. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3. Even though the Galaxy Fold is much heavier than the Galaxy S III, it's way thinner and also incredibly newer.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy S III counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, although it has a lot smaller display, a quite worse screen density and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S III, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera aperture for better low light images. The Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S III, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S III, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S III. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S III, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.