Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2012-05-03 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 195.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III's 74.8 global score. Galaxy M20's design is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy S III's, although it is noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, providing the user some additional features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy S III has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a much smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a way lower display pixel density. The Galaxy M20 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S III, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S III counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less and slower cores, it also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy M20 captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy M20 also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 138 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.