Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
LTE 2 GB RAMGT-I9305
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 580 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III, with an 81.1 score against 74.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a lot newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S III, although it is incredibly heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, counting with some additional features and performance enhancements.
The Galaxy S III counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a much lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution, a just a little less pixels per display inch and a much smaller display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a way larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S III, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.