Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-05-22 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Polycarbonate | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8960A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S III MetroPCS's 70.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A6 is a heavier but somewhat thinner phone than Galaxy S III MetroPCS. The Galaxy A6 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A6, because although it has a little bit lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S III MetroPCS, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also has a way larger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations, a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A6 has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB and 16 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A6 counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A6 is also a bit cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.