Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blue |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 306 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8960A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy J7 Star has a score of 73.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy S III MetroPCS's 70.8 global score. The Galaxy J7 Star is a noticeably heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S III MetroPCS, but they have the same thickness. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy J7 Star has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S III MetroPCS has Android 4.0.4.
Galaxy J7 Star features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Galaxy J7 Star also counts with a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS has a more vivid display than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1280 x 720 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS also counts with a just a little greater pixel number in each screen inch.
The Galaxy J7 Star features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 Star shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy J7 Star also counts with a lot higher 13 MP resolution camera and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Galaxy J7 Star counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy J7 Star is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.