Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8960A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, having a global score of 71.5 against 70.8. Galaxy S III Cricket is a a little bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, but both of them have the same thickness. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS has Android 4.0.4 version.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a screen that is very similar to the display in Galaxy S III MetroPCS, both of them have the same number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a same size screen and the same resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a processing unit that's just as good as Galaxy S III MetroPCS's CPU, both of them have 2 GB of RAM memory, a 400 megahertz graphics processing unit and 2 cpu cores. The Galaxy S III Cricket's camera is very similar to the Galaxy S III MetroPCS one, they have the same resolution back facing camera, a same size camera sensor, the same video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution.
Galaxy S III MetroPCS and Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket feature incredibly similar battery durations.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.